Widgets: So 2007?

From Mapping the Web:

Up until recently, it seemed like everyone and their dog was launching a widget-based start-up or a web 2.0 company that served up widgets. The hope was that these widgets would spur viral distribution, creating widespread exposure. In many cases, this did occur. But now what? Where is the monetization? How can revenue be generated via these eyeballs? Most held on to the hope that eyeballs would attract potential acquisitors. In other words, their revenue model was an exit strategy in disguise – the infamous “web 2.0 revenue model”.

My friend Nathan at nPost just released a new job widget into the wild.  It’s not a pure widget play, but an enabler of nPost’s main business model.  It seems like a great way to market and distribute his service.   Frankly, that’s the only way I’ve ever thought widgets (should) work; pure-play widget makers are an ephemera that are interesting only to the people who wear the web 2.0 undies.  If you can’t monetize your traffic, you’re going out of business.  Whether you shut the doors yourself, or let some sucker investor do the shutting for you, business without profit is, well….OK, I’ll give you General Motors, but the general rule is you need profit to stay in business.

Let’s keep widgets where they belong — as a distribution method, not as a business unto themselves.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

TwitterCounter for @anthonyrstevens
Add to Technorati Favorites

RSS Feed

View Anthony Stevens's profile on LinkedIn

%d bloggers like this: